Blind Equalization with Arbitrary Decision Delay using One-Step Forward Prediction Error Filters 


Vol. 28,  No. 2, pp. 181-192, Feb.  2003


PDF
  Abstract

Blind equalization of communication channel is important because it does not need training signal, nor does it require a priori channel information. So, we can increase the bandwidth efficiency. The linear prediction error method is perhaps the most attractive in practice due to the insensitive to blind channel equalizer length mismatch as well as for its simple adaptive implementation. Unfortunately, the previous one-step prediction error method is known to be limited in arbitrary decision delay. In this paper, we propose method for fractionally spaced blind equalizer with arbitrary decision delay using one-step forward prediction error filter from second-order statistics of the received signals for SIMO channel. Our algorithm utilizes the forward prediction error as training signal and computes the best decision delay from all possible decision delay. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of our proposed algorithm.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

K. Ahn and H. Baik, "Blind Equalization with Arbitrary Decision Delay using One-Step Forward Prediction Error Filters," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 181-192, 2003. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Kyung-Seung Ahn and Heung-Ki Baik. 2003. Blind Equalization with Arbitrary Decision Delay using One-Step Forward Prediction Error Filters. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 28, 2, (2003), 181-192. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Kyung-Seung Ahn and Heung-Ki Baik, "Blind Equalization with Arbitrary Decision Delay using One-Step Forward Prediction Error Filters," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 181-192, 2. 2003.