Performance Comparisons on the Strategies of Sleep Window Size Adjustment for Power Saving in IEEE 802.16e 


Vol. 32,  No. 11, pp. 1113-1119, Nov.  2007


PDF
  Abstract

In this paper, first, we proposed various possible candidate schemes for determining initial sleep window size and varying sleep window size in sleep mode for power saving class I of IEEE 802.16e. Then, we analyzed and compared the power saving performances of those schemes. The schemes used for the comparisons are EICV of IEEE 802.16e, and other comparable schemes such as EIED, EILD, LIED and LILD. Experimental results show that LILD and EIED outperform other comparable schemes. Especially, EIED shows the better performances for the case of high traffic intensity environments, while LILD does for the low traffic intensity case.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

D. H. Son and B. Roh, "Performance Comparisons on the Strategies of Sleep Window Size Adjustment for Power Saving in IEEE 802.16e," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1113-1119, 2007. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Dae Hong Son and Byeong-hee Roh. 2007. Performance Comparisons on the Strategies of Sleep Window Size Adjustment for Power Saving in IEEE 802.16e. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 32, 11, (2007), 1113-1119. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Dae Hong Son and Byeong-hee Roh, "Performance Comparisons on the Strategies of Sleep Window Size Adjustment for Power Saving in IEEE 802.16e," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1113-1119, 11. 2007.