A Framework Development for Correspondence Criteria of DDoS 


Vol. 35,  No. 2, pp. 68-77, Feb.  2010


PDF
  Abstract

the government and companies build a ddos correspondence system hastily to protect assets from cyber threats. it is become more and more intelligent and advanced such as ddos attack. however, when outbreaks of the social incidents such as 7.7 ddos attack or cases of the direct damage occurred, information security systems(iis) only become the issue in the short term. as usual, sustained investment about iss is a negative recognition. since the characteristic of iss is hard to recognize the effectiveness of them before incidents occurs. also, results of incidents occurred classify attack and detection. detailed and objective measurement criterion to measure effectiveness and efficiency of iss is not existed. recently, it is progress that evaluation and certification about for the information security management system(isms). since these works propose only a general guideline, it is difficult to utilize as a result of isms improvement for organization. therefore, this paper proposes a framework to develop main criteria by a correspondence strategy and process. it is able to detailed and objective measurements.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

B. Kim, Y. Shin, J. Kim, "A Framework Development for Correspondence Criteria of DDoS," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 68-77, 2010. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Bum-jae Kim, Yong-tae Shin, and Jong-bae Kim. 2010. A Framework Development for Correspondence Criteria of DDoS. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 35, 2, (2010), 68-77. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Bum-jae Kim, Yong-tae Shin, Jong-bae Kim, "A Framework Development for Correspondence Criteria of DDoS," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 68-77, 2. 2010.