On the Relationship Between the Performance Criteria of Unitary Space-Time Codes with Noncoherent and Coherent Decoding 


Vol. 35,  No. 12, pp. 1145-1151, Dec.  2010


PDF
  Abstract

Hochwald et al. introduced unitary space-time codes for quasi-static Rayleigh fading channels which allows for noncoherent decoding when the channel response is not known at the receiver. However, when reliable information on the channel response is available, coherent decoding is preferable for improved performance. Here, we study the relationship between the performance criteria on the diversity and coding advantages provided by unitary space-time codes with noncoherent and coherent decoding. We show that when a unitary space-time code achieves full spatial diversity with noncoherent decoding, full spatial diversity is also guaranteed with coherent decoding.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

K. Cheun, J. Kim, S. Choi, "On the Relationship Between the Performance Criteria of Unitary Space-Time Codes with Noncoherent and Coherent Decoding," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1145-1151, 2010. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Kyungwhoon Cheun, Jeongchang Kim, and Soongyoon Choi. 2010. On the Relationship Between the Performance Criteria of Unitary Space-Time Codes with Noncoherent and Coherent Decoding. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 35, 12, (2010), 1145-1151. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Kyungwhoon Cheun, Jeongchang Kim, Soongyoon Choi, "On the Relationship Between the Performance Criteria of Unitary Space-Time Codes with Noncoherent and Coherent Decoding," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1145-1151, 12. 2010.