DT-GPSR: Delay Tolerant-Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing Protocol 


Vol. 41,  No. 2, pp. 189-197, Feb.  2016


PDF
  Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) experience frequent link disconnections due to non-uniform node distribution and mobility. Thus, end-to-end path establishment-based routing protocols cause frequent transmission failures in MANETs, resulting in heavy control messages for path reestablishment. While location-based MANET routing protocols, such as Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR), use location information to forward messages in a hop-by-hop routing fashion without an end-to-end path establishment procedure, such protocols encounter communication void problems when message forwarding to the next hop fails due to the absence of a relay node. Therefore, to solve this problem, this paper proposes a Delay Tolerant-GPSR (DT-GPSR) protocol, which combines Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) technology with the GPSR protocol. The performance of DT-GPSR is compared with the performances of the original GPSR and PRoPHET routing protocols through simulation using NS-2. The simulation results confirm that DT-GPSR outperforms GPSR and PRoPHET in terms of the message delivery ratio and message delivery delay.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

J. Nam and Y. Cho, "DT-GPSR: Delay Tolerant-Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing Protocol," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 189-197, 2016. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Jae-Choong Nam and You-Ze Cho. 2016. DT-GPSR: Delay Tolerant-Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing Protocol. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 41, 2, (2016), 189-197. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Jae-Choong Nam and You-Ze Cho, "DT-GPSR: Delay Tolerant-Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing Protocol," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 189-197, 2. 2016.