A Study on the Impact Factors for the Difference of Mobile Termination Charges among the Countries 


Vol. 34,  No. 10, pp. 1031-1042, Oct.  2009


PDF
  Abstract

Due to liberalization in the early stage, mobile communications market has grown rapidly in the world. However, some dominant operators set higher termination call charges, and thus the market has been distorted and customer welfare has been reduced a lot. The regulation of mobile termination charges is one of key issues of most regulatory agencies in the world. According to the survey, the level of mobile termination charges are quite different from country to country. Why is it so different? This paper investigated the determinants affecting the mobile termination charges for 28 countries by considering country-specific, industry-specific, and regulatory-specific conditions. We found that some regulatory-specific conditions are the most important factors. The rate of pre-paid contract and period of regulation mostly affect the mobile termination charges.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

E. Cho, M. Park, J. Byun, T. Heo, "A Study on the Impact Factors for the Difference of Mobile Termination Charges among the Countries," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1031-1042, 2009. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Eun-jin Cho, Myeong-Cheol Park, Jae-ho Byun, and Tae-Young Heo. 2009. A Study on the Impact Factors for the Difference of Mobile Termination Charges among the Countries. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 34, 10, (2009), 1031-1042. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Eun-jin Cho, Myeong-Cheol Park, Jae-ho Byun, Tae-Young Heo, "A Study on the Impact Factors for the Difference of Mobile Termination Charges among the Countries," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1031-1042, 10. 2009.