Asynchronous Message Delivery among Mobile Sensor Nodes in Stationary Sensor Node based Real-Time Location Systems 


Vol. 36,  No. 2, pp. 148-158, Feb.  2011


PDF
  Abstract

Stationary nodes and mobile nodes co-exist wireless sensor network(WSN) can provide variety of new services. The stationary sensor node acts not only the gathering the environmental sensing data but also a access point to bidirectional communication with numerous mobile sensor nodes(mobile node), and the mobile sensor nodes are installed inside mobile objects and identify the location in real-time and monitor the internal status of the object. However, only using the legacy WSN protocol, it is impossible to set up the stable network due to the several reasons caused by the free-mobility of the mobile nodes. In this paper, we suggest three methods to increase the hit-ratio of the asynchronous message delivery(AMD) among mobile nodes. We verified the performance of the suggested methods under the stationary-mobile co-existed WSN testbed.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

W. Kim, S. Jeong, T. Kim, S. Kang, "Asynchronous Message Delivery among Mobile Sensor Nodes in Stationary Sensor Node based Real-Time Location Systems," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 148-158, 2011. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Woo-Jung Kim, Seol-Young Jeong, Tae-Hyon Kim, and Soon-Ju Kang. 2011. Asynchronous Message Delivery among Mobile Sensor Nodes in Stationary Sensor Node based Real-Time Location Systems. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 36, 2, (2011), 148-158. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Woo-Jung Kim, Seol-Young Jeong, Tae-Hyon Kim, Soon-Ju Kang, "Asynchronous Message Delivery among Mobile Sensor Nodes in Stationary Sensor Node based Real-Time Location Systems," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 148-158, 2. 2011.